State Intervention in Religious Moderation through the “Kampung Moderasi Beragama” Policy: Evidence from Serang City
Society Volume 13 Issue 3#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Ideological State Apparatus Pluralism Policy Formalization Religious Moderation State Intervention

How to Cite

Maisaroh, I., Stiawati, T., & Mahpudin, M. (2025). State Intervention in Religious Moderation through the “Kampung Moderasi Beragama” Policy: Evidence from Serang City. Society, 13(3), 1099-1117. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i3.930

Share

Views
  • Abstract 114
  • PDF (English) 98
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

This study examines state intervention in managing religious diversity through the Kampung Moderasi Beragama (KMB) program in Serang City, Banten. Despite the extensive promotion of religious moderation in Indonesia, limited attention has been paid to how such policies operate at the local level and how state formalization reshapes community-based pluralism. Addressing this gap, the study adopts a qualitative exploratory case study involving two urban villages (Kota Baru and Banten Lama) and fifteen key informants drawn from government institutions, religious organizations, and community groups. Data were collected between April and May 2025 through triangulated interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. The findings indicate that KMB functions primarily as a state-led process of formalization rather than a grassroots initiative. The dominance of state actors, the limited involvement of non-state groups, and weak intersectoral coordination render the program largely symbolic. Drawing on Althusser’s concept of the Ideological State Apparatus and Tania Murray Li’s notion of rendering technical, this study demonstrates how the state translates complex social relations into bureaucratic projects that promote narratives of harmony while marginalizing the lived realities of pluralism. Theoretically, the study contributes to critical governance scholarship by showing how state-led religious moderation can reproduce ideological control under the guise of tolerance. Practically, it highlights the need for participatory and context-sensitive governance that strengthens local ownership, interfaith collaboration, and cross-sectoral integration, enabling KMB to evolve from a performative initiative into a transformative platform for social cohesion.

PDF (English)

References

Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500

Althusser, L. (1970). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Towards an Investigation on the Reproduction of the Conditions of Production. Monthly Review Press, 1–52.

Althusser, L. (2015). Ideologi dan Aparatus Ideologi Negara: Catatan-catatan Investasi. Indoprogress, 74.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Fauzi, M. M. (2025). Prinsip Moderasi Beragama Antar Umat Beragama Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa. Jurnal Sadewa : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v3i2.1768

Hasyim, F., & Junaidi, J. (2023). Penguatan Moderasi Beragama sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Radikalisme dan Intoleransi Pelajar di Karesidenan Surakarta. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36722/jpm.v6i1.2141

Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508

Idi, A., & Priansyah, D. (2023). The Role of Religious Moderation in Indonesian Multicultural Society: A Sociological Perspective. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 2(4), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i4.55

Kawangung, Y. (2019). Religious moderation discourse in plurality of social harmony in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n1.277

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2021). Siaran Pers No. 143/HM/KOMINFO/04/2021: Sejak 2018, Kominfo tangani 3.640 ujaran kebencian berbasis SARA di ruang digital. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/pengumuman/detail/siaran-pers-no-143-hm-kominfo-04-2021-tentang-sejak-2018-kominfo-tangani-3-640-ujaran-kebencian-berbasis-sara-di-ruang-digital

Leniawati, I., & Haq, M. Z. (2024). The Implementation of Islamic Moderation Principles in Addressing the Challenges of Political Identity Polarization. Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies, 3(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v3i2.42

Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319893444

Murray Li, T. (2022). Chapter 3 Rendering Society Technical: Government through Community and the Ethnographic Turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In Adventures in Aidland (Issue December 2022, pp. 57–80). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780857451118-004

Setara Institue. (2022). Conditions of Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia 2021. In Annual Monitoring Report. SETARA Institute. https://setara-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Siaran-Pers-Kondisi-KBB-2022-SETARA-Institute.pdf

Soedirgo, J. (2018). Informal networks and religious intolerance: how clientelism incentivizes the discrimination of the Ahmadiyah in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445490

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768

Subchi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Latifa, R., & Sa’diyah, S. (2022). Religious Moderation in Indonesian Muslims. Religions, 13(5), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050451

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Ima Maisaroh, Titi Stiawati, Mahpudin Mahpudin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.