Contesting Space and Representational Politics: State–Community Conflict in the Development of the Suramadu Area
Society Volume 13 Issue 1#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Community Resistance Henri Lefebvre Land Acquisition Madura Spatial Politics State–Community Conflict Suramadu Development

How to Cite

Mutmainnah, M. (2025). Contesting Space and Representational Politics: State–Community Conflict in the Development of the Suramadu Area. Society, 13(1), 687-704. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.788

Share

Views
  • Abstract 57
  • PDF (English) 43
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

This study explores the contestation of space between the state and local communities in the development of the Suramadu region, particularly the planned construction of a coastal tourism area (Madura Park) in Sekar Bungoh Hamlet, Sukolilo Barat Village, Bangkalan Regency. The research aims to analyze how spatial politics are exercised in the development process, identify the key actors involved, and understand who benefits and who is marginalized in implementing Suramadu's development agenda. Using a qualitative research approach, data were collected through non-participant observation, in-depth interviews with affected residents and government actors, and analysis of planning documents and media coverage. The study is framed by Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space, particularly the concepts of spatial practice, representations of space, and representational space. Findings reveal that the spatial planning of Suramadu's development, articulated through the master plan of the Surabaya–Madura Regional Development Agency (BPWS), prioritizes state and investor interests while marginalizing local communities. The government’s representation of space emphasizes economic growth through tourism, trade, and industrial zones, often at the expense of community rights and historical attachments to the land. The forced displacement and land acquisition processes have generated resistance from residents, who organized through the "Kelompok Masyarakat Tolak Penggusuran" (Community Group Against Eviction) to defend their land, heritage, and livelihoods. Their resistance highlights material grievances and symbolic struggles over recognition, justice, and participation in spatial decision-making. This study concludes that spatial development in Suramadu is marked by structural asymmetries of power, in which space becomes a site of political contestation rather than shared progress. It also underscores the importance of participatory and culturally informed spatial planning to mitigate conflict and ensure equitable development outcomes.

PDF (English)

References

Afiff, S. A., & Rachman, N. F. (2019). Institutional Activism: Seeking Customary Forest Rights Recognition from Within the Indonesian State. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670245

Anand, N., Gupta, A., & Appel, H. (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Duke University Press.

Bappenas. (2020). The national medium-term development plan (RPJMN) 2020–2024 (English version). Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas). https://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/e-library/file_upload/koleksi/migrasi-data-publikasi/file/RP_RKP/Narasi-RPJMN-2020-2024-versi-Bahasa-Inggris.pdf

Blomley, N. (2004). Unsettling the City. In Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499801

Budiyanti, S., Siahaan, H. M., & Nugroho, K. (2020). Social communication relation of Madurese people in Max Weber rationality perspective. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 4(2), 389. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i2.2447

Bunnell, T., & Das, D. (2010). Urban pulse- A geography of serial seduction: Urban policy transfer from Kuala Lumpur to Hyderabad. Urban Geography, 31(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.3.277

Butt, S. (2014). The Position of International Law within the Indonesian Legal System. Emory International Law Review, 28(95), 1.

Corbera, E. (2012). Powers of exclusion. Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(1), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.656241

Elden, S. (2004). Understanding Henri Lefebvre. In Understanding Henri Lefebvre. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547798

Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20(2), 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00064-0

Ferguson, J. (2006). Global shadows: Africa in the neoliberal world order. Duke University Press.

Firman, T. (2004). New town development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: A perspective of spatial segregation. Habitat International, 28(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00037-7

Firman, T. (2014). Inter-local-government partnership for urban management in decentralizing Indonesia: from below or above? Kartamantul (Greater Yogyakarta) and Jabodetabek (Greater Jakarta) compared. Space and Polity, 18(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2014.959252

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409

Fraser, N. (2014). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In Justice Interruptus (pp. 79–108). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822174-11

Global Green Growth Institute. (2022). Country planning framework (CPF) Indonesia 2021–2025. https://gggi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Indonesia-CPF-2021-2025-1.pdf

Goldman, M. (2011). Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 555–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01001.x

Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002). Splintering Urbanism. In Splintering Urbanism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Harimurti, Y. W., Fauzan, E. M., Purbasari, I., & Yulianingsih, I. (2020). Consensus as democratic education on the village consultative body election in Bangkalan. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(2), 84–110.

Harvey, D. (2020). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. In The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles (pp. 14–21). Pluto Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17ppcd0.8

Holston, J. (2021). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1hw3xwv

Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2012). Beyond property: Industrial estates and post-suburban transformation in Jakarta Metropolitan Region. Cities, 29(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.003

Hudalah, D., Winarso, H., & Woltjer, J. (2017). Gentrifying the Peri-Urban: Land use confl icts and institutional dynamics at the frontier of an indonesian metropolis. Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning 6: The Right to the City, 53(3), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628127

Hudalah, D., & Woltjer, J. (2007). Spatial planning system in transitional Indonesia. International Planning Studies, 12(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701640176

Johnson, T., & Scott, J. C. (2001). Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. African Studies Review, 44(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/525426

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.

Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. In Land’s End. Duke University Press.

Lin, G. C. S. (2014). China’s landed urbanization: Neoliberalizing politics, land commodification, and municipal finance in the growth of metropolises. Environment and Planning A, 46(8), 1814–1835. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130016p

Lucas, A., & Warren, C. (2013). The land, the law, and the people. In Land for the people: The state and Agrarian conflict in Indonesia (pp. 1–39). Ohio University Press/Swallow Press.

McCarthy, J. F. (2000). The changing regime: Forest property and reformasi in Indonesia. Development and Change, 31(1), 91–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00148

Miraftab, F. (2015). Insurgent Planning. In Readings in Planning Theory (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 480–498). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119084679.ch24

Moser, S., & Côté-Roy, L. (2022). Reflections on researching new cities underway in the Global South. Journal of Urban Affairs, 46(9), 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2133726

Ongkowijoyo, C. S., Gurmu, A., & Andi, A. (2021). Investigating risk of bridge construction project: exploring Suramadu strait-crossing cable-stayed bridge in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2020-0018

Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 27 Tahun 2008 tentang Badan Pengembangan Wilayah Surabaya–Madura. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/42212/perpres-no-27-tahun-2008

Rachman, N. F. (2016). Bersaksi Untuk Pembaruan Agraria: dari Tuntutan Lokal Hingga Kecenderungan Global. Insist Press, Yogyakarta. www.insist.or.id

Ristiawan, R., Huijbens, E. H., & Peters, K. (2024). Apprehending Land Value Through Tourism in Indonesia: Commodification of Rural Landscapes Through Geoparks. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 115(1), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12597

Schindler, S., & Kanai, J. M. (2021). Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies. Regional Studies, 55(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984

Shatkin, G. (2016). The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities, 53, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015

Simarmata, H. A., & Surtiari, G. A. K. (2020). Adaptation to Climate Change: Decision Making and Opportunities for Transformation in Jakarta, Indonesia. In Discussion Document COP25. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD). https://cdn.unrisd.org/assets/library/papers/pdf-files/synthesis-transformative-adaptation-coastal-cities-2020.pdf

Simone, A. M. (2004). For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press.

Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001

Spivak, G. (2014). Can the Subaltern Speak? In The Postcolonial Studies Reader (3rd ed., pp. 33–39). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469039-8

Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9s

Wijardjo, B., & Perdana, H. (2001). Reklaiming dan Kedaulatan Rakyat. YLBHI.

Yiftachel, O. (2017). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Political Economy, Diversity and Pragmatism: Critical Essays in Planning Theory: Volume 2, 12(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315246543-23

Zoomers, A., van Noorloos, F., Otsuki, K., Steel, G., & van Westen, G. (2017). The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes. World Development, 92, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.016

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Mutmainnah Mutmainnah

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.